Book a call
What we do

Data Engineering Services

A data foundation your team can trust, and operate without us.
Results from our data work
5.35M
monthly visitors on a headless content platform
Wiki case
1,000s
of free-form emails parsed into structured data every day
SLM email case
<5 min
to set up retail analytics from fiscal data
Retail analytics case

MetaProject provides data engineering services for teams whose data has outgrown its plumbing. The dashboards disagree, the pipelines break silently, "one source of truth" is three sources that don't reconcile, and every new analytics or ML request turns into a bespoke project.

The problem is rarely a missing tool. It's the absence of a coherent, governed data platform and the practice to run it. We build that foundation embedded with your team, senior-only, and leave the capability in your hands rather than becoming the only people who understand it.

What we build

Data pipelines that don't fail silently. Ingestion and transformation across batch and streaming, with reliability engineered in: idempotency, retries, schema-change handling, and alerting that surfaces a broken pipeline before the business notices bad numbers. Built with the tools that fit your stack (Airflow, dbt, Spark, Kafka, cloud-native services), chosen for a documented reason rather than fashion.
A data platform / lakehouse that scales. A coherent architecture (warehouse, lake or lakehouse) with clear layers (raw, staged, curated), sensible storage and compute separation, and cost controls so the bill doesn't run away as volume grows. The goal is a platform where adding a new dataset or consumer is a routine step rather than a re-architecture.
Data quality and governance as first-class concerns. Automated data-quality checks and tests in the pipeline (not manual spot-checks after the fact), lineage so you can trace any number back to its source, a data catalog people actually use, and access controls and PII handling that satisfy compliance (GDPR, HIPAA, SOC 2); see DevSecOps Consulting.
Streaming and real-time data where the domain needs it: event-driven pipelines with the ordering and latency guarantees the use case actually requires, and the discipline not to add streaming complexity where a batch job would do.
Analytics and ML enablement. The engineering foundation that makes analytics and ML reliable (feature pipelines, reproducible datasets, and inference data flows that respect governance and PII boundaries), so your data scientists build on solid ground instead of firefighting data issues.

Principles: how we approach data engineering

1.
Governed by default, not after an incident.
Quality, lineage and access are designed into the platform from the start. Retrofitting them after a bad-data or privacy incident is far more expensive.
2.
Match the architecture to the workload.
Not every team needs streaming, a lakehouse, or a warehouse-per-domain. We build what your data volume, latency needs, and team maturity actually justify.
3.
Cost is an architectural constraint.
Cloud data platforms are where budgets quietly run over. We treat FinOps discipline as part of the design, not a later clean-up.
4.
The team has to be able to run it.
A data platform your team can't operate calmly is a liability. Operability and capability transfer are primary constraints, not afterthoughts.

How we work with your teams

Our senior data engineers embed with your squads, using your tools and repos. We map your current data landscape and pain points with the people who live them, design and build the platform and pipelines in the flow of real work (not a sandbox proof of concept), author ADRs for every consequential decision, and pair and coach your engineers so they own and extend the platform. Because we're senior-only, your team sees what we build and how we reason about the trade-offs, so the practice sticks. See CoE Design & Transition and Delivery as Training.

Why this matters

CTO / VP Engineering:
‍
‍
A governed, documented data platform your organisation owns: reliable numbers, controlled cost, and no single-vendor dependency for every change.
Head of Data / Analytics:
‍
‍
Pipelines that don't fail silently, lineage you can trust, and a platform where new data products are routine.
Data scientists & analysts:

‍
Reliable, reproducible data to build on, instead of spending half their time debugging pipelines.
Compliance & Security:

‍
PII handling, access controls, and audit-ready lineage designed in.
Finance / FinOps:
‍
‍
platform cost calibrated to actual need, with visibility instead of surprise cloud bills.

When to bring us in

Your dashboards disagree and no one fully trusts the numbers.
Pipelines break silently and data issues surface downstream, late.
Every new analytics or ML request becomes a bespoke, fragile project.
You're standing up a data platform (warehouse, lake, or lakehouse) and want the right architecture from the start.
You're preparing for analytics or ML at scale and need a reliable, governed foundation first.
Cloud data costs are climbing faster than the value you're getting from them.

Data engineering cost

Data platforms are sized by sources, volume and how fresh the data has to be.
Data audit
$10k–$25k
2–4 weeks
Sources, pipelines, quality issues and a target architecture.
Data platform build
$60k–$200k
2–6 months
Warehouse or lakehouse, pipelines, modelling and governance.
Embedded data team
$20k–$40k/mo
ongoing
Senior data engineers extending the platform with your team.
Typical ranges for engagements like this. Your number depends on scope, team size and how fast you need to move. Get a range for your project in two minutes.
5.0
Rated on Clutch from 16 verified client reviews. Read the reviews on Clutch
★★★★★

“Their level of commitment and dedication to the success of the overall effort is their most impressive attribute.”

Wolf Berkych, Client Experience Manager, Glow Design Agency
★★★★★

“Everything was delivered within the timelines given and with high standards.”

Matt Davenport, Founder, App Software Company

Data engineering FAQ

How much do data engineering services cost?

A data audit costs $10k–$25k. Building a data platform with pipelines, modelling and governance typically costs $60k–$200k over 2–6 months. An embedded senior data team costs $20k–$40k a month.

What's the difference between data engineering services and data engineering consulting?

Consulting is the assessment and design: what platform and pipelines you need and why. Services is the build. We do both, embedded: we design the data platform and build it with your team, ending with your engineers able to run and extend it.

Do we need a data warehouse, a data lake, or a lakehouse?

It depends on your workloads. Warehouses suit structured analytics; lakes suit large, varied, raw data; lakehouses aim to combine both. We recommend based on your data volume, latency needs, query patterns, and team maturity, not on a default preference.

Can you work with our existing stack?

Yes. We work with your existing warehouse and orchestration (Snowflake, BigQuery, Databricks, Redshift, Airflow, dbt, Kafka, etc.) rather than imposing a stack. Tooling follows from your architecture and constraints.

How do you handle data governance and PII?

As first-class design concerns: access controls, PII classification and handling, lineage, and audit-ready evidence mapped to the frameworks your business needs (GDPR, HIPAA, SOC 2), built into the platform from the start.

Will we depend on you to run the platform afterwards?

No, by design. The engagement is structured around capability transfer: documentation in your repos, trained internal owners, and a skills matrix. Your team operates the platform without us.

Get an honest read on your data foundation

Tell us what you are building. On a 30-minute call a senior engineer walks through your data platform and pipelines. Or get a first view of the team and timeline in two minutes.